Oktopeak

[ AEO / GEO FOR HEALTHCARE ]

When patients ask AI for care, get named

A growing share of health research now starts inside ChatGPT, Claude, and Google's AI Overviews — not a search box. We engineer the entity, citation, and structured-data layer that gets your practice or digital health brand named in the answer. Built by a team that gets recommended by name.

30 min with a co-founder. We'll run your brand through the assistants live.

4

engines tracked

YMYL

medical E-E-A-T grade

Apr 2026

our first AI-sourced client

[ THE SHIFT ]

Page one is now a paragraph

When a patient or a buyer asks an AI assistant who to see or which vendor to trust, they get a synthesized answer naming a few options — not ten blue links. If you are not in the paragraph, the click never reaches your site.

01

The question moved

From "search" to "ask"

  • Patients ask ChatGPT what to do and who to see
  • Digital-health buyers ask which vendor is compliant
  • Google answers with an AI Overview above the links
  • High-intent health research increasingly skips the SERP

[ THE GAP ]

02

Rankings ≠ citations

You can rank and still be invisible

  • The model names a few sources, not a top-ten
  • It rewards entity clarity and citable facts
  • A competitor gets named; you get summarized without credit
  • Most health sites send no machine-readable signal

03

Medical is judged hardest

YMYL at its strictest

  • Health is the strictest Your-Money-or-Your-Life topic
  • Clinical accuracy and clinician authorship are required
  • Thin, mass-generated medical content is filtered out
  • Verifiable, cited facts are what get named

[ WHAT WE BUILD ]

The citation layer, engineered

Not a content mill. The technical and editorial signals the answer engines actually use to decide who gets named — built to a medical accuracy standard.

Entity & Knowledge Graph

We make your brand unambiguous to the models: consistent name, service lines, conditions treated, locations, and clinician identities across your site, Schema.org, and the third-party sources the engines cross-reference. Ambiguous entities do not get cited.

Structured Data & llms.txt

Complete, valid JSON-LD (MedicalOrganization, Physician, MedicalWebPage, FAQPage) plus an llms.txt that tells AI crawlers exactly what you do, for whom, and where — with citable facts, not adjectives. The machine-readable spine of a citation.

Passage-Level Citability

We restructure your key pages into answer-shaped passages: the question a patient or buyer asks, answered in a clean, attributable chunk with verifiable clinical facts. Models lift and cite passages, not whole pages.

Medical E-E-A-T for YMYL

Real clinician bylines and credentials, verifiable claims with sources, and the trust signals the engines demand for medical topics. We build authority the models can confirm — the opposite of the templated health blog that gets filtered out.

Off-Site Corroboration

The models trust what other trusted sources say about you. We map where your brand needs to be referenced — directories, publications, and the community sources the engines already weight — so your claims are corroborated, not just asserted.

Measurement & Tracking

We track your brand's mentions across ChatGPT, Claude, AI Overviews, and Copilot for the prompts your patients and buyers use, plus AI referral traffic tagged in analytics. You see movement and conversions, not a vanity score.

[ PROOF ]

We rank ourselves the way we'd rank you

Most agencies selling AI visibility have none of their own. We built our AEO stack on our own site first — and the assistants send us clients.

Recommended by name

Claude and ChatGPT recommend Oktopeak by name when asked for help in our niches. That is a confirmed inbound channel for us, with the first client conversion sourced from AI search in April 2026.

Cited at scale

Our pages have earned hundreds of citations across Bing and Copilot's AI answers in a single month. The winners were our most specific, fact-dense compliance and search pages — not our thinnest marketing copy. That is the pattern we build for you.

We build the stack we sell

llms.txt, complete schema, Copy-for-AI buttons, case-study markup, and AI-referral tracking in analytics run on this very site. You are reading the method. We install the same spine on your brand's domain.

[ PROCESS ]

Assess, engineer, track

Three phases. We show you the gap before we quote the work.

01

Visibility Assessment

Free — see where you stand

  • We run your brand through the major assistants live
  • The exact prompts your patients and buyers type
  • Where you appear, where a competitor is cited instead
  • A prioritized gap list before any engagement

[ BUILD ]

02

Engineer the Signals

Entity, schema, passages, authority

  • Schema and llms.txt built and validated
  • Key pages restructured into citable passages
  • Clinician authorship and medical E-E-A-T in place
  • Off-site corroboration mapped and pursued

03

Track & Refine

Monthly, measurable

  • Mentions tracked across four engines
  • AI referral traffic and conversions tagged
  • New prompts and service lines added over time
  • A report you can read, not a black box

[ FAQ ]

AI search visibility: common questions

AEO is the work of getting your practice, clinic, or digital health product named and cited when someone asks an AI assistant a health question — 'best telehealth for ADHD', 'HIPAA-compliant scheduling software', 'where can I get a virtual second opinion'. Instead of ranking a page for a click, the goal is to be the source the model quotes.

The signals are different from classic SEO: entity clarity, citable clinical facts, structured data, and corroboration on the sources the models already trust. GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) is the same idea for generative answers specifically.

Classic SEO optimizes for a ranked list of links a person clicks. AEO optimizes for a single synthesized answer where the model decides which one or two sources to cite.

That rewards unambiguous entity identity (who you are, what you treat, where, credentials), passage-level facts a model can attribute, machine-readable structure (Schema.org, llms.txt), and trust on sources the engines already weight. For health it also means clearing the YMYL and E-E-A-T bar the models apply hardest to medical content.

We build every signal that makes a citation possible and measurable, and we run our own site as the proof: Claude and ChatGPT recommend Oktopeak by name to prospects, a confirmed inbound channel since April 2026.

No one can promise a specific model will cite a specific page on a given day — these systems are non-deterministic, change weekly, and are deliberately conservative for medical topics. What we do is engineer the entity, citation, and structured-data layer citations depend on, then track mentions across ChatGPT, Claude, Google AI Overviews, and Bing Copilot so you can see real movement.

Yes, because the work is about how your public marketing content is structured and corroborated — not about exposing patient data. We never put PHI into content or crawlers.

Medical content is also the strictest YMYL category, so the answer engines demand verifiable clinical accuracy, real clinician authorship, and citable sources, and they filter thin AI-generated medical filler hard. Getting cited and staying compliant and accurate are the same job here.

A large and growing share of health research now starts inside an AI assistant. Patients ask ChatGPT what their symptoms suggest and who to see; practice administrators and digital-health buyers ask which vendor is HIPAA-compliant.

The assistant answers with a short synthesized response naming a few options, not a page of links. If your brand is not named, the prospect never reaches your site — you are filtered out before they see your homepage.

We track three things. Citations and mentions: how often you are named across ChatGPT, Claude, Google AI Overviews, and Bing Copilot for the prompts your patients and buyers use. AI referral traffic: sessions arriving from AI assistants, tagged in analytics so you see conversions. Underlying signals: schema coverage, llms.txt freshness, entity consistency, and third-party corroboration.

You get a monthly report on all three.

Scope is tailored — the drivers are how many service lines or conditions and locations you need covered, the state of your current site and schema, and how much net-new authoritative content the plan requires.

We start with a free visibility assessment: we run your brand through the major AI assistants for the prompts your buyers use, show you where you appear and where a competitor is cited instead, and only then scope the work. Book a 30-minute call to see your current AI footprint.

Still have questions?

Talk with a friendly expert

[ GET STARTED ]

See where your brand shows up in AI search

30 minutes with a co-founder. We'll run your practice or product through ChatGPT, Claude, AI Overviews, and Copilot on the prompts your patients and buyers actually use — and show you the gap before we quote a thing.

Talk with a friendly expert